sexta-feira, 2 de abril de 2010

Nem sei o que por como título

Sartreist existentialism in the works of Pynchon

Jean K. Reicher
Department of Deconstruction, Oxford University


1. Realism and the postcultural paradigm of expression

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between masculine and feminine. However, the primary theme of Wilson’s[1] analysis of Sartreist existentialism is not, in fact, construction, but preconstruction.
The main theme of the works of Pynchon is the stasis, and therefore the meaninglessness, of subcultural sexual identity. Baudrillard uses the term ‘dialectic capitalism’ to denote the bridge between society and art. In a sense, Geoffrey[2] states that we have to choose between Sartreist existentialism and the neotextual paradigm of consensus.
The primary theme of Sargeant’s[3] essay on the postcultural paradigm of expression is not narrative per se, but subnarrative. Thus, if realism holds, we have to choose between precultural structuralist theory and postmodern Marxism.
The economy, and subsequent meaninglessness, of Sartreist existentialism intrinsic to Rushdie’s The Moor’s Last Sigh is also evident in The Ground Beneath Her Feet. In a sense, a number of theories concerning a textual reality may be revealed.
The subject is interpolated into a subdeconstructivist discourse that includes consciousness as a totality. However, Sartre uses the term ‘realism’ to denote the role of the poet as writer.
The subject is contextualised into a Sartreist existentialism that includes language as a paradox. Thus, Debord uses the term ‘the postcultural paradigm of expression’ to denote not semanticism, but presemanticism.

2. Rushdie and modern theory

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of subtextual sexuality. In Satanic Verses, Rushdie affirms realism; in The Ground Beneath Her Feet he denies Sartreist existentialism. But Reicher[4] implies that we have to choose between the postcultural paradigm of expression and dialectic objectivism.
If one examines Sartreist existentialism, one is faced with a choice: either reject neoconceptual narrative or conclude that the significance of the participant is social comment, given that culture is equal to consciousness. Sontag’s analysis of Sartreist existentialism suggests that the establishment is capable of significant form. It could be said that Baudrillard promotes the use of the postcultural paradigm of expression to deconstruct hierarchy.
“Society is meaningless,” says Foucault; however, according to Werther[5] , it is not so much society that is meaningless, but rather the futility of society. If Sartreist existentialism holds, we have to choose between realism and dialectic sublimation. But the subject is interpolated into a postcultural paradigm of expression that includes art as a reality.
The prestructural paradigm of narrative implies that reality is used to exploit the underprivileged. Thus, any number of narratives concerning Sartreist existentialism exist.
The creation/destruction distinction depicted in Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children emerges again in The Moor’s Last Sigh, although in a more self-supporting sense. However, the characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is a cultural totality.
Tilton[6] suggests that we have to choose between realism and capitalist dematerialism. Therefore, the main theme of Sargeant’s[7] essay on semioticist libertarianism is not discourse, but postdiscourse.
Foucault uses the term ‘realism’ to denote a self-referential reality. It could be said that in Chasing Amy, Smith deconstructs prepatriarchial situationism; in Clerks, although, he affirms realism.

1. Wilson, Y. T. D. (1988) The Rubicon of Consensus: Sartreist existentialism and realism. And/Or Press
2. Geoffrey, T. D. ed. (1993) Realism in the works of Rushdie. Schlangekraft
3. Sargeant, B. T. B. (1980) Reinventing Social realism: Nationalism, realism and capitalist desituationism. Harvard University Press
4. Reicher, J. ed. (1975) Realism in the works of Pynchon. Yale University Press
5. Werther, N. P. F. (1992) Reading Lacan: Realism and Sartreist existentialism. O’Reilly & Associates
6. Tilton, D. ed. (1985) Sartreist existentialism and realism. University of Georgia Press
7. Sargeant, Q. D. (1990) Precultural Appropriations: Sartreist existentialism in the works of Smith. University of California Press

Daqui.

Se gostou faça o seu artigo pós-moderno aqui.

0 comments: